<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gary Smith Slams Open Cup</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/</link>
	<description>A look at Major League Soccer (MLS) through the eyes of a MLS writer and fan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:57:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: seba</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/comment-page-1/#comment-13407</link>
		<dc:creator>seba</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 19:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/?p=3793#comment-13407</guid>
		<description>if the portscum Portland Timbers make it to the third round to play the Sounders, (which I highly doubt, see Hollywood United last year) then that will be an Open Cup game worth watching...otherwise for Seattle the tourney is just a way of getting into the CCL quicker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if the portscum Portland Timbers make it to the third round to play the Sounders, (which I highly doubt, see Hollywood United last year) then that will be an Open Cup game worth watching&#8230;otherwise for Seattle the tourney is just a way of getting into the CCL quicker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SDM</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/comment-page-1/#comment-13403</link>
		<dc:creator>SDM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/?p=3793#comment-13403</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s always another alternative.....don&#039;t play in it. It&#039;s not like you are required to play in it. Perhaps if enough MLS teams say &quot;thanks, but no thanks&quot;, the USSF will actually a.) Market the games so people will take notice, and b.) actually make it worth it money wise for teams to want to try and win it. Are you telling me with all the bucks US Soccer brings in, $200k is all they can afford to give the winner? Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s always another alternative&#8230;..don&#8217;t play in it. It&#8217;s not like you are required to play in it. Perhaps if enough MLS teams say &#8220;thanks, but no thanks&#8221;, the USSF will actually a.) Market the games so people will take notice, and b.) actually make it worth it money wise for teams to want to try and win it. Are you telling me with all the bucks US Soccer brings in, $200k is all they can afford to give the winner? Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TCompton</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/comment-page-1/#comment-13400</link>
		<dc:creator>TCompton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/?p=3793#comment-13400</guid>
		<description>I think that Gary&#039;s intention is good here, but after a loss, it comes off a lot like whining.  It would be great if the US Open Cup had a more prominent and significant role in US Soccer in general.  

First, one of the biggest challenges that I see with the USOC is that unlike, England, the US does not have an organization of professional soccer that allows for the cost of implementing an FA Cup styled (and appreciated) tournament to exist.  Additionally, the geographic size of the United States makes this cost much greater than that of England.  The lack of this infrastructure also leads to a lack of suitable fields to host these matches.  I&#039;m not sure of the funds that the US Soccer Federation has available, but I&#039;m going to go out on a limb and assume that it&#039;s budget pales in comparison to that of England&#039;s (or Great Britain&#039;s or United Kingdom&#039;s) Football Association.  I just don&#039;t think that it would be a wise use of funding to spend considerable amount of funds on the USOC when what the US desperately needs is to find a way to develop the plethora talented young Americans. 

Second, from an MLS perspective, MLS Clubs are asked to put together rosters within a series of restrictions (e.g., salary cap, roster size, international athletes, limited sources of available talent, etc.).  What this means is that some clubs cannot afford to field competitive line-ups due to injuries, fatigue, or fixture congestion.  As a result, the clubs chose to start players who may not have seen significant game minutes.  This obviously makes it appear that MLS clubs do not view the USOC as significant or important.  While I do not normally think this is the case, it is what it is.

Finally, although USSF has awarded the fourth Champions League slot to the USOC in an attempt to give it more significance, the financial benefit of advancing and winning does not necessarily exceed the cost of participation to the point that it becomes worthwhile to take it that seriously.   I&#039;m not sure of the payout for winning, advancing to the final, semi-finals, quarter-finals, etc., but I do remember that coach of an amateur club had to take pay for his team&#039;s trip to Los Angeles to face Chivas USA out of his own pockets.  It just seems like there is something wrong about that.  

Regardless, Gary has some valid points in his argument, but the fix is not simply a flip of the switch.  Competitive soccer in the US should not be compared to that of England, Italy, or Spain.  Attempts to do so result in wild comparisons that overlook (or discount completely) the unique differences of the game played in the US vs. Europe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Gary&#8217;s intention is good here, but after a loss, it comes off a lot like whining.  It would be great if the US Open Cup had a more prominent and significant role in US Soccer in general.  </p>
<p>First, one of the biggest challenges that I see with the USOC is that unlike, England, the US does not have an organization of professional soccer that allows for the cost of implementing an FA Cup styled (and appreciated) tournament to exist.  Additionally, the geographic size of the United States makes this cost much greater than that of England.  The lack of this infrastructure also leads to a lack of suitable fields to host these matches.  I&#8217;m not sure of the funds that the US Soccer Federation has available, but I&#8217;m going to go out on a limb and assume that it&#8217;s budget pales in comparison to that of England&#8217;s (or Great Britain&#8217;s or United Kingdom&#8217;s) Football Association.  I just don&#8217;t think that it would be a wise use of funding to spend considerable amount of funds on the USOC when what the US desperately needs is to find a way to develop the plethora talented young Americans. </p>
<p>Second, from an MLS perspective, MLS Clubs are asked to put together rosters within a series of restrictions (e.g., salary cap, roster size, international athletes, limited sources of available talent, etc.).  What this means is that some clubs cannot afford to field competitive line-ups due to injuries, fatigue, or fixture congestion.  As a result, the clubs chose to start players who may not have seen significant game minutes.  This obviously makes it appear that MLS clubs do not view the USOC as significant or important.  While I do not normally think this is the case, it is what it is.</p>
<p>Finally, although USSF has awarded the fourth Champions League slot to the USOC in an attempt to give it more significance, the financial benefit of advancing and winning does not necessarily exceed the cost of participation to the point that it becomes worthwhile to take it that seriously.   I&#8217;m not sure of the payout for winning, advancing to the final, semi-finals, quarter-finals, etc., but I do remember that coach of an amateur club had to take pay for his team&#8217;s trip to Los Angeles to face Chivas USA out of his own pockets.  It just seems like there is something wrong about that.  </p>
<p>Regardless, Gary has some valid points in his argument, but the fix is not simply a flip of the switch.  Competitive soccer in the US should not be compared to that of England, Italy, or Spain.  Attempts to do so result in wild comparisons that overlook (or discount completely) the unique differences of the game played in the US vs. Europe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WTF</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/comment-page-1/#comment-13398</link>
		<dc:creator>WTF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/?p=3793#comment-13398</guid>
		<description>The greatest failure of MLS and USSF is marketing.  These people are totally clueless.  Given FSC and Gol air re-runs 80% of their schedule, there is no excuse not to televise a draw and multiple games each round.  Even if USSF has to buy the time (FSC and Gol have such poor ratings it would not be very expensive).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The greatest failure of MLS and USSF is marketing.  These people are totally clueless.  Given FSC and Gol air re-runs 80% of their schedule, there is no excuse not to televise a draw and multiple games each round.  Even if USSF has to buy the time (FSC and Gol have such poor ratings it would not be very expensive).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonji</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2009/05/28/gary-smith-slams-open-cup/comment-page-1/#comment-13397</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonji</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 16:04:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/?p=3793#comment-13397</guid>
		<description>Gary is saying what many fans think.  MLS treats the tournament as an unimportant event and US Soccer gives them a reason to.  It should be run like the FA Cup.  MLS teams should not have to qualify to get into the third round.  Whatever the issues are preventing the two sides cooperating to make this a bigger event should be overcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary is saying what many fans think.  MLS treats the tournament as an unimportant event and US Soccer gives them a reason to.  It should be run like the FA Cup.  MLS teams should not have to qualify to get into the third round.  Whatever the issues are preventing the two sides cooperating to make this a bigger event should be overcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
