<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Look Back: US MNT Kits Since 94</title>
	<atom:link href="http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/</link>
	<description>A look at Major League Soccer (MLS) through the eyes of a MLS writer and fan.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 15:57:35 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rory Miller</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/comment-page-1/#comment-7415</link>
		<dc:creator>Rory Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 2008 21:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/#comment-7415</guid>
		<description>I hate them all sooooo much.

Actually I hated the Gold Cup blue with pinstripes the first time I saw them then I kind of liked them.  Now I love them compared to that polo crap we&#039;ll be wearing for a while. (Please lord, have them change it soon).

Maybe if we lose to Mexico we&#039;ll never wear them again?  That would make a nice consolation prize.

Hell, how about a very plain white with the badge?  That would be a massive improvement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate them all sooooo much.</p>
<p>Actually I hated the Gold Cup blue with pinstripes the first time I saw them then I kind of liked them.  Now I love them compared to that polo crap we&#8217;ll be wearing for a while. (Please lord, have them change it soon).</p>
<p>Maybe if we lose to Mexico we&#8217;ll never wear them again?  That would make a nice consolation prize.</p>
<p>Hell, how about a very plain white with the badge?  That would be a massive improvement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim K</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/comment-page-1/#comment-7364</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 16:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/#comment-7364</guid>
		<description>Personally, I think the only ones that look good are the New pinstipe blue and the old nike with the cirlce around the number. When did grey even become an option???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally, I think the only ones that look good are the New pinstipe blue and the old nike with the cirlce around the number. When did grey even become an option???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barefoot</title>
		<link>http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/comment-page-1/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>Barefoot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 15:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://wvhooligan.com/2008/01/31/a-look-back-us-mnt-kits-since-94/#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>I enjoy fashion criticism as much as the next fan, but in reality I&#039;d back the lads even if they played home games in full length sequined cowl-back gowns.  Incidentally, the original Nike proposal for the 2008 home kit was indeed a full length blue and white sequined gown with red numbers.  I have it on good authority that this initial offering ran into resistance from US Soccer as Sunil Gulati was insisting on a tea-length kit.  

The kit was a compromise based on the FC Dallas away kit. But the narrower &quot;hoops&quot; look was shot down by Gulati. Who, my sources tell me, is convinced that ugly uniforms have become a distinguishing &quot;brand&quot; for US Soccer. In a final effort to appease Gulati, Nike uglified the hoop look by widening the stripes until the current travesty was acceptable.

Personally, my favorite by far is the &quot;Aviator Stripe&quot; from 1996.  The current dark blue away jersey uses this same pattern (and has been our most consistent look).  I&#039;m also a fan of the 7/4/04 special jesrsey with the vertical wavy stripes.  

If it were my call, I would go with the white Aviator Stripe for home.  The River Plate look for away, and the July-4th kit for third or special occasions.

(PS - check your style sheet definitions, this comment box extends to the right off the visible page)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoy fashion criticism as much as the next fan, but in reality I&#8217;d back the lads even if they played home games in full length sequined cowl-back gowns.  Incidentally, the original Nike proposal for the 2008 home kit was indeed a full length blue and white sequined gown with red numbers.  I have it on good authority that this initial offering ran into resistance from US Soccer as Sunil Gulati was insisting on a tea-length kit.  </p>
<p>The kit was a compromise based on the FC Dallas away kit. But the narrower &#8220;hoops&#8221; look was shot down by Gulati. Who, my sources tell me, is convinced that ugly uniforms have become a distinguishing &#8220;brand&#8221; for US Soccer. In a final effort to appease Gulati, Nike uglified the hoop look by widening the stripes until the current travesty was acceptable.</p>
<p>Personally, my favorite by far is the &#8220;Aviator Stripe&#8221; from 1996.  The current dark blue away jersey uses this same pattern (and has been our most consistent look).  I&#8217;m also a fan of the 7/4/04 special jesrsey with the vertical wavy stripes.  </p>
<p>If it were my call, I would go with the white Aviator Stripe for home.  The River Plate look for away, and the July-4th kit for third or special occasions.</p>
<p>(PS &#8211; check your style sheet definitions, this comment box extends to the right off the visible page)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
